Crash-safety is an important property of real systems, as the main functionality of some systems is resilience to crashes. Toward a compositional verification approach for crash-safety under full-system crashes, one observes that crashes propagate instantaneously to all components across all levels of abstraction, even to unspecified components, hindering compositionality. Furthermore, in the presence of concurrency, a correctness criterion that addresses both crashes and concurrency proves necessary. For this, several adaptations of linearizability have been suggested, each featuring different trade-offs between complexity and expressiveness. The recently proposed compositional linearizability framework shows that to achieve compositionality with linearizability both a locality and observational refinement property are necessary. Despite that, no linearizability criterion with crashes has been proven to support an observational refinement property.

In this paper, we define a compositional model of concurrent computation with full-system crashes. We use this model to develop a compositional theory of linearizability with crashes, which reveals a criterion, crash-aware linearizability, as its inherent notion of linearizability and supports both locality and observational refinement. We then show that strict linearizability and durable linearizability factor through crash-aware linearizability as two different ways of translating between concurrent computation with and without crashes, enabling simple proofs of locality and observational refinement for a generalization of these two criteria. Then, we show how the theory can be connected with a program logic for durable and crash-aware linearizability, which gives the first program logic that shows some form of linearizability with crashes. We showcase the advantages of compositionality by verifying a library facilitating programming persistent data structures and a fragment of a transactional interface for a file system.